— · Early market
Sparse liquidity and venue structure.Cycle Lab · Calendar hypothesis
Same clock. Different market.
Four-year comparisons are useful only when market maturity, liquidity and demand transmission remain visible.
Structural record
Halving intervals widened.
The protocol events are verified. Return paths remain schematic on the public portal until an eligible daily Bitcoin history is approved.
1,319 days · Retail expansion
ICO-era market structure differs materially.1,402 days · Institutional entry
Pandemic liquidity distorted the macro comparison.1,440 days · ETF era
Spot ETF flows change the demand transmission channel.Model rule
Calendar position never decides the regime.
Price structure, participation, liquidity, leverage health and macro confirmation must be evaluated independently of days since halving.
Interactive schematic
Halving-aligned paths
| Cycle | Peak index | Peak day | Maximum drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 720 | 550 | -41.7% |
| 2016 | 420 | 550 | -27.4% |
| 2020 | 360 | 550 | -31.9% |
| 2024 | 198 | 550 | -33.3% |
What the chart shows
The selected 800-day schematic expressed as normalized.
Blue Rogues Read
Cycle shape changes materially as liquidity, access and market maturity change. The calendar supplies alignment, not causality.
What it confirms
The four protocol eras can be compared on one declared clock.
What it does not confirm
These curves are not licensed historical closes, a current signal or a price target.
Evidence required next
Approve a commercially reusable daily Bitcoin series, freeze it point-in-time and reproduce the same transforms.
- Source
- Blue Rogues schematic research fixture
- Frequency
- 10-day visual interpolation
- Coverage
- Day 0–800 after halving
- Transform
- four-year-schematic/v2 · normalized
- Observed
- Model revision August 30, 2026
Cycle research describes evidence and conditional regimes. It does not provide individualized investment advice, a guaranteed outcome or an automatic publication trigger.
